One of the two fast-seeking-time, 150 GB, HDD of my raid 1 was
steadily loosing sectors until it was hanging the system. To be
changed. At the time the disks were installed (year 2006) 150 GB was
the maximum for sata fast-seeking-time. With 50 GB for linux and the
applications, a bare 100 GB space are left for the data. With
intermediate 2-electron integral files I already encountered lack of
space, while I plan do use gamess or nwchem code linked to Amber once
that will become available.
But even for classical MD, where I am mostly involved, I guess that
investing money in a new fast-seeking-time disk for only 150 GB, as a
raid 1 replacement, is not for what I really need. I was also
wondering whether a 300 GB fast-seeking-time HDD is worth the money
for UMA-type motherboard with 4 dual-opteron cpus and DDR1 400MHz. I
suspect that a normal SATA disk of 500 GB with 32 MB cache and < 8
millisecond random seek time would afford much the same performance as
a fast-seeking disk with 4 millisecond random seek time but much less
cache.
Much grateful for either supporting my plan in replacing the disks, or
pointing out my error.
thanks
francesco pietra
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sun Mar 08 2009 - 01:07:06 PST
