RE: [AMBER] binding free energy

From: Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 09:29:35 -0800

Hi Don,

> It would be nice if sander and pmemd would try to be a little more
> failsafe when writing the restrt file. For example, one could move
> the previous restrt file to a temporary location in the same directory
> (filesystem), write the new restrt, and then, if successful, delete
> the old. Of course, this would cause temporary spikes in disk usage
> that might make failure on a near-full filesystem come sooner rather
> than later. But I think it would be worth it to have failures from
> which one can recover more easily.

Amber 10 can already do something close to this. You just set ntwr<0 and
then every time it writes a restart file it will just append an increasing
number to the end of it. This way you can keep all restart files and you
avoid the problems of corruption happening during a restart write since you
don't overwrite previous restarts so only loose at most the time between the
point of corruption and the previous restart write.

This of course does nothing to help you if you don't have the disk space to
store them all.

All the best
Ross


/\
\/
|\oss Walker

| Assistant Research Professor |
| San Diego Supercomputer Center |
| Tel: +1 858 822 0854 | EMail:- ross.rosswalker.co.uk |
| http://www.rosswalker.co.uk | PGP Key available on request |

Note: Electronic Mail is not secure, has no guarantee of delivery, may not
be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues.





_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Mar 02 2009 - 01:10:38 PST
Custom Search