AMBER: Electrostatic Energy Components

From: <>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:29:08 +0100

Dear Amber experts,

I would like to ask a question that probably you will
consider trivial. What is the difference between the
energy components 1-4 EEL and EELEC ?

I am performing REMD simulations in implicit solvent
(igb=7) on a number of peptides. As I understand EGB
represents the electrostatic component of the energy
of interaction with the solvent while EEL 1-4 and
EELEC refer to the intramolecular interaction energy.
Why is this energy split in two components? Why is
the EEL 1-4 term usually positive while EELEC is
generally negative ? I noticed that there is a sort of
compensation between EELEC and EGB, that is the peptides
with lower EELEC have higher EGB and vice-versa.
I interpreted this correlation by assuming that,
if a residue interact strongly with other residues in the
protein, it cannot interact as strongly with the solvent.
Is my interpretation correct?

I also noticed that if I add together EEL 1-4 and EELEC,
this correlation with EGB becomes weaker. Why is it so?
I ask you this question because in my work, I started with
a free peptide and then I created a number of variants
closed with disulfide bonds placed in different positions.
Which quantity is it better to use to study the intramolecular
electrostatic energy, EELEC or EELEC + EEL 1-4?

I thank you very much for your help and I am looking forward to
receiving feedback from you,

Carlo Guardiani

This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
Received on Fri Dec 05 2008 - 16:17:17 PST
Custom Search