I came across (but not examined) messages complaining about
antechamber in amber10 (amber tools 1.0). If present complaining is a
duplication of such messages, please forget about it.
I am dealing with pyrazine compounds, where antechamber in amber10
(ambertools 1.0) complains that atom 1 (N) is not a valid atom. I have
not fully investigated the issue as I am in a hurry, though, changing
to amber9, no error message and the prepin file is a valid file.
Notice that generation of the pdb file was with the same package that
I have always used with success with respect to antechamber. In
particular, the atom types were correct for the force fields used (MMX
MM3 MMFF94)
francesco pietra
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Mon Sep 15 2008 - 03:07:38 PDT
