Hi Majeed,
Sorry for the misunderstanding, I just assumed by the fact that you had so
few waters that this must be a solvent cap simulations. In this case you
have a very small number of water molecules for a periodic simulation. A 6.2
angstrom buffer of water for the solvatebox command is very small and I
suspect that your box is rapidly shrinking, due to the initial density being
too low and then the box is too small for the cutoff. AMBER was never
designed to simulate very small periodic systems. I suggest adding much more
water to your system, at a minimum in this situation I would suggest adding
a 10 angstrom buffer of water although even this may be too small once the
density equilibrates. Try printing to the output more frequently so you can
see how the box volume reduces during the simulation before it stops. (do
NOT set the cut off less than 8 angstroms).
Good luck,
Ross
From: owner-amber.scripps.edu [mailto:owner-amber.scripps.edu] On Behalf Of
Majeed Shaik
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 10:43 AM
To: amber.scripps.edu
Subject: RE: AMBER: Cutoff list exceeds largest sphere in unit cell
Hello Ross,
I am infact trying to run a simulation with periodic conditions … in my
system with a particular conc. Hence I have 32 imidazoles with 216 waters. I
am not sure if I am right using solvatebox TIP3PBOX command to do in such
way. If I am wrong whats the right way to do it…
I have 0.5fs arbitrarily ….
Majeed
_____
From: owner-amber.scripps.edu [mailto:owner-amber.scripps.edu] On Behalf Of
Ross Walker
Sent: 10 September 2008 17:01
To: amber.scripps.edu
Subject: RE: AMBER: Cutoff list exceeds largest sphere in unit cell
Hi Majeed,
You have set up a solvent cap system (in a sphere of water) but are trying
to run a periodic simulation (ntb=2, ntp=1) - hence the problems.
Are you sure that a non-periodic harmonic boundary solvent cap is what you
want to run? You should be using a cut off with this type of simulation btw
(set cut = 999) which will likely mean it is slower than a periodic boundary
simulation - hence you would probably be better off running a full periodic
simulation, unless there is some reason for running the solvent cap.
Do you also have a reason for using a 0.5fs time step with shake on?
Good luck,
Ross
From: owner-amber.scripps.edu [mailto:owner-amber.scripps.edu] On Behalf Of
Majeed Shaik
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 7:55 AM
To: amber.scripps.edu
Subject: AMBER: Cutoff list exceeds largest sphere in unit cell
Using AMBER9 I am running a MD simulations of 32 imidazole molecules in 216
TIP3P water molecules and the following is the input
Imidazole : 250ps MD
&cntrl
imin = 0,
irest = 1,
iwrap = 1,
ntx = 5,
ntb = 2,
pres0 = 1.0,
ntp = 1,
taup = 2.0,
cut = 8,
ntr = 0,
ntc = 2,
ntf = 2,
tempi = 298.0,
temp0 = 298.0,
ntt = 1,
nstlim = 500000,
dt = 0.0005,
ntpr = 10000,
ntwx = 50000,
ntwr = 10000
/
And the put the TIP3P molecules using solvatebox TIP3PBOX 6.2
I get the following error from the simulation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
4. RESULTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
---------------------------------------------------
APPROXIMATING switch and d/dx switch using CUBIC SPLINE INTERPOLATION
using 5000.0 points per unit in tabled values
TESTING RELATIVE ERROR over r ranging from 0.0 to cutoff
| CHECK switch(x): max rel err = 0.2738E-14 at 2.422500
| CHECK d/dx switch(x): max rel err = 0.8314E-11 at 2.736960
---------------------------------------------------
| Local SIZE OF NONBOND LIST = 27841
| TOTAL SIZE OF NONBOND LIST = 123196
check COM velocity, temp: 0.000000 0.00(Removed)
check COM velocity, temp: 0.000000 0.00(Removed)
check COM velocity, temp: 0.000000 0.00(Removed)
check COM velocity, temp: 0.000000 0.00(Removed)
Cutoff list exceeds largest sphere in unit cell!!
Big problems with imaging!!
a,b,c = 34.9189665530652 34.1192964048493
19.9999946872118
alpha,beta,gamma = 90.0000000000000 90.0000000000000
90.0000000000000
cutlist,sphere = 10.0000000000000 9.99999734360589
any suggestions please…
Thank you
Majeed
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Thu Sep 11 2008 - 08:42:27 PDT
