Dear Scott,
Thanks for your reply. We have check the ptraj.out and find that
we had only used -bintraj in paralllel compile, so the ptraj does not
support bintraj. Thus, we recompile both serial and parallel amber9,
both with -bintraj. This time, we passed bintraj test. But we still
got three possible failures, which is the same as we reported last
time.
Here is the diff file:
possible FAILURE: check mdout.jar.001.dif
/public/amber9/test/jar_multi
177c177
< Etot = -3538.3785 EKtot = 478.2764 EPtot =
-4016.6548
---
> Etot = -3538.3784 EKtot = 478.2764 EPtot = -4016.6548
180c180
< EELEC = -18.4200 EGB = -2503.6434 RESTRAINT =
3.6286
---
> EELEC = -18.4199 EGB = -2503.6434 RESTRAINT = 3.6286
---------------------------------------
possible FAILURE: check rem.log.dif
/public/amber9/test/rem_gb_4rep
26c26
< 2 1.15 234.76 -3.24 300.00 400.00 0.80
---
> 2 1.15 261.02 -4.61 300.00 400.00 0.80
---------------------------------------
possible FAILURE: check reminfo.000.dif
/public/amber9/test/rem_gb_4rep
16,20c16,20
< NSTEP = 100 TIME(PS) = 100.800 TEMP(K) = 234.76 PRESS = 0.
< Etot = 21.0164 EKtot = 24.2585 EPtot =
-3.2421
< BOND = 14.3725 ANGLE = 19.8208 DIHED =
25.4361
< 1-4 NB = 5.7103 1-4 EEL = 182.5250 VDWAALS =
-5.9319
< EELEC = -213.6574 EGB = -31.5175 RESTRAINT = 0.
---
> NSTEP = 100 TIME(PS) = 100.800 TEMP(K) = 261.02 PRESS = 0.
> Etot = 22.3628 EKtot = 26.9719 EPtot = -4.6092
> BOND = 14.9791 ANGLE = 17.9986 DIHED = 25.4386
> 1-4 NB = 5.6257 1-4 EEL = 182.4183 VDWAALS = -5.8981
> EELEC = -213.4152 EGB = -31.7563 RESTRAINT = 0.
---------------------------------------
And now, we can say that the last two possible failure is
reproducible. How can we figure them out?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun Oct 21 2007 - 06:07:05 PDT