Lilian,
indeed, there are 10 fs between MC steps, but since ONLY one is looked
at every MC step, with 10 residues being protonable, each one is really
looked at ONLY after 100 fs, on average.
Makes sense ?
Lillian chong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm confused about the following statement in the AMBER9 manual under
> "Running at constant pH": "...Note that only one residue is examine on each
> step, so you should decrease the step period as the number of titrating
> residues increases to maintain a constant effective step period for each
> residue..."
>
> What is meant by the "effective step period"? From what I understand, when
> you specify ntcnstph=5 and dt=0.002, this means that there are 10 fs of MD
> simulation between MC steps. The manual mentions that good results have
> been obtained with a 100 fs effective step period for each residue (e.g.
> ntcnstph=5, dt=0.002 with about 10 residues titrating). Not sure how an
> effective step period of 100 fs per residue is concluded from these
> parameters?
>
> Any clarification on this would be great.
>
> Thanks!
> Lillian
>
--
Dr. Adrian E. Roitberg
Associate Professor
Quantum Theory Project and Department of Chemistry
University of Florida PHONE 352 392-6972
P.O. Box 118435 FAX 352 392-8722
Gainesville, FL 32611-8435 Email adrian.qtp.ufl.edu
============================================================================
To announce that there must be no criticism of the president,
or that we are to stand by the president right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."
-- Theodore Roosevelt
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Sep 26 2007 - 06:07:03 PDT