Dear AMBER users,
I'm trying to introduce non-standard amino acid residue into my protein
for the further MD simulation. To accomplish that I get the parameters
for -NH-CHR-CO- in ANTECHAMBER. Then I create the library for the
residue and add it into the libraries in Xleap and so on. I realized
that the charges for N, C, CA (and the other, of course, too) atoms in
the prepin file are quite different (for a example for peptide bonded N
with the calculated n1 type it is at least 0.2-0.3 charge units more
negative than peptide bonded N in standard amino acid ) compared to
standard amino acids. It is not a surprise since 1. AM1-BCC method for
sure should give the results different from standard AMBER charges 2. N
atom, for example, has one more uncoupled electron pair compared to the
N atom in peptide-bonded state. Is there the way to use non-standard
amino acid residues within the protein without this charge problem?
Thank you very much in advance for the answer!
Sergey
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Jul 18 2007 - 06:07:25 PDT
