Re: AMBER: Simulating proteins with calcium ion

From: Qing Zhang <qingzhang_nyu.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 23:26:11 -0800 (PST)

> ----- Original Message ----
> From: <clarkzhy.mail.bnu.edu.cn>
> In my EF-PROTEIN system, the Ca2+ coordination hold a good octahedron coordination
> if we regard the water molecule as a ligand when using the calcium parameter in
> amber99 forcefield.

I don't understand what you mean "regard the water molecule as a ligand". Is there any water molecule involving in the Ca2+ coordination?

> of cource, I change both the radius and the epsilon values to use the small
> parameter, calcium ions escape from a C2-domain, but is ok in EF-protein, while
> the Ca-O distance is too samll, only 2.1-2.4.

If I understand correctly, using the Aqvist's vdw parameters for Ca2+ causes the ions escape from one protein (with a C2-domain) but not from the other one (EF-protein)? The latter one has Ca-O distances ranging from 2.1 to 2.4 Angstrom after MD. Could you explain why the Ca2+ ions escape from the C2-domain? The shorter Ca2+ vdw radius leads to shorter Ca-oxygen distances and thus should makes the Ca-oxygen electrostatic attraction stronger.

Thanks,

Qing






-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun Dec 24 2006 - 06:07:48 PST
Custom Search