Dear Amber users
I'm having some disagreement with work coleagues of mine over some of
the standard terminology used in residue development.
In the following example: Data was computed at the
"B3LYP/6-31++G(2d,2p)//HF/6-31G(d) level of theory"
In the above, my take on the terminology is this:
The portion to the left of the double slash
(i.e.B3LYP/6-31++G(2d,2p))denotes the level of theory for the
optimisation, whilst the portion to the right of the double slash
(HF/6-31G(d)) represents the level of theory used to generate the
electrostatic potential. Am I right?
If I am right, is it always the case that the first portion denotes
information for optimisation, and the second portion information for
deriving the electrostatic potential?
many thanks
Hayden Eastwood
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun Nov 05 2006 - 06:07:06 PST
