Hello David,
>OK: this all sounds fine. I don't see any reason why the density should not
>equilibrate. You should look visually at the starting and ending structures
>(or at a movie of the trajectory) to see if something is funny. The initial
>isooctane geometry will probably be very bad, and it could be that it would
>take a very long time to equlibrate. If the geometries look very odd (with
>lots of holes or cavities), you might be better off to preprare a "Box" unit
>(from your simulation on pure isooctane) and then to solvate the micelle in
>that box (rather than in a single molecule). That would get you a much
By "solvate the micelle in that box" do you mean that I put the micelle into the equilibrated Isooctane box to solvate it?
Thank you.
>better starting structure.
>
>(I don't think the presence of absence of restraints on the micelle is
>relevant here.)
>
>...good luck...dac
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>The AMBER Mail Reflector
>To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
>To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
>
>
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Jianhui
tianj.rpi.edu
2006-10-04
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun Oct 08 2006 - 06:07:09 PDT
