Re: [UCE]Re: RE: AMBER: potential energy

From: Fenghui Fan <fenghui_fan.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:41:09 -0700 (PDT)

But how about MM-PBSA? For the protein, ligand and the
protein-ligand comples should have something in common

 and comparable on energy. So what will be their 0
point for each component of the energy?

Best regards.

Fenghui Fan

-
--- Thomas Cheatham <tec3.utah.edu> wrote:

>
> > Usually kineticn energy >0
> > and potential energy <0
> > and total erngy <0 for most system.
> > however if we met the case below
> > kineticn energy >0
> > and potential energy <0
> > and total erngy >0 ******
> > does this MD simulation valid or not.
>
> Short answer to your question (building on what Ross
> Walker said): The
> potential energy is relative. We do not have a
> set/known zero point for
> each molecule, or equivalently, you cannot directly
> compare molecular
> mechanics potential energies for different
> molecules. It does not matter
> whether the total potential energy is positive or
> negative, nor does the
> value directly relate to its stability compared to
> other molecules as the
> zero point could be positive, negative or zero
> depending on the
> parameterization.
>
> Some additional points. The terms for the bonds and
> angles are harmonic
> and therefore always zero or positive. Torsions are
> typically positive,
> however there is no restriction in the code that
> disallows a negative
> force constant. Negative potential energy values
> typically come from the
> pairwise potential and will depend on how strong the
> van der Waals
> attraction is (assuming limited repulsion) and the
> balance of the charges.
>
> With the standard force fields we use, and TIP3P
> water, typically the
> electrostatics is large and negative. However, if
> you used the TIP3SP
> model as parameterized in CHARMM, the energy is
> typically "higher" due to
> the inclusion of a vdw repulsion term on the water
> hydrogens (absent in
> TIP3P). The energy change running with these two
> potentials does not
> state anything about the relative stability of the
> respective MD
> simulations; they just have different energy zero
> points.
>
>
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to
> majordomo.scripps.edu
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Sep 20 2006 - 06:07:14 PDT
Custom Search