Re: AMBER: reference of ff99

From: Myunggi Yi <myunggi.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:21:59 -0400

Are the partial charges of the 20 amino acids for ff99
and ff94 same?

There is only all_amino94.in and cterminal and n-terminal.
NO 99 charges. Am I correct?



On 8/31/06, Myunggi Yi <myunggi.gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Amber community,
>
> I am looking for the reference of ff99,
> Wang et. al. 1999 paper.
>
> I can't find his paper in 1999
> from reference file, the end of the manual.
>
>
> --
> Best wishes,
>
> MYUNGGI YI
> ==================================
> KLB 419
> Institute of Molecular Biophysics
> Florida State University
> Tallahassee, FL 32306
>
> Office: (850) 645-1334
> http://www.scs.fsu.edu/~myunggi
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
>


-- 
Best wishes,
MYUNGGI YI
==================================
KLB 419
Institute of Molecular Biophysics
Florida State University
Tallahassee, FL 32306
Office: (850) 645-1334
http://www.scs.fsu.edu/~myunggi
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun Sep 03 2006 - 06:07:14 PDT
Custom Search