If your transformation is smooth enough to integrate (dv/dl vs. l), I
think your result is ok. How many lambda values did u use, and how does
the dv/dl vs. l graph (where l stands for lambda) look like?
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Vitor Manuel Sousa F?x wrote:
> Dear Amber users
>
> I am calculating the binding free energies between an
> artificial receptor and several cations and anions in an
> organic solvent using the thermodynamic integration
> methodology. The mutations involve only the change of vdw
> parameters, for example Na+ to K+ alone and in the
> presence of the receptor. In my case I obtain better
> results when a klamba=6 is used instead of klamba=1 (the
> agreement between the theoretical an experimental delta G
> solvation energies for the mutations M to M ´ in organic
> solvents are better for klamba=6. In the literature these
> type of transformations were usually reported with
> klamba=1. The question is the following: Is it
> scientifically acceptable undertake this type of
> transformation with klamba=1 ?...
>
> Thanks a lot in advance for your help
>
> Vitor Felix
>
>
> *****************************
> Vitor Felix
> Department of Chemistry
> University of Aveiro
> 3810-193 Aveiro
> Portugal
> Tel: 351 234 370 729
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
>
>
--
Ilyas Yildirim
---------------------------------------------------------------
- Department of Chemisty - -
- University of Rochester - -
- Hutchison Hall, # B10 - -
- Rochester, NY 14627-0216 - Ph.:(585) 275 67 66 (Office) -
- http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~yildirim/ -
---------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Aug 16 2006 - 06:07:13 PDT
