On Fri, Jun 09, 2006, Yongmei Pan wrote:
>
> I use sander epsilon=4r model to do minimization for nmode ntrun=1. When
> there is no restraint, it works well; But when the backbone is restrained
> (it???s also restrained in nmode), there is small difference between the
> energies from sander min and nmode, which leads to the different rms
> gradients. That is to say, even if the rmsg in sander reaches for example,
> 1E-4, the rmsg from nmode just 1E-2. And this is the case when nmode won???t
> continue because the rmsg is bigger than the required rmsd. So is there any
> way to fix the problem? Thanks!
This problem has been discussed before, and the fix is here:
http://amber.ch.ic.ac.uk/archive/200603/0265.html
Somehow, it looks like this never got posted as a bugfix....I'll put one
up soon. (The amber9 code has the fix as well).
...thanks...dac
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun Jun 11 2006 - 06:07:21 PDT
