Thanks for the response.
> > * in my particular case using default i/o I have problems with mixed
> > ext 000/001 (although in test it seemed to be OK):
> >
> are you writing replica outputs or temperature-based outputs?
I used the default as in the test, that should be for a given
temperature.
> the code cannot handle the same temp0, this exchange is temperature-based
> so you end up dividing by zero if they match. Amber9 will check the inputs for
> this.
sander seems to run; delta remains zero, but I did not see division
with delta.
> It's not clear excatly what you mean by the last statement.
> Did you get a "run2.out.000" file? Did you get one called
> "run2.out.001"?
> I haven't seen any similar behavior myself (e.g. having multisander
> not output files from each "group member").
again, at the same temp0 (that I should not use) only run2.out and
run2.out.000 are produced not run2.out.001. run2.out is supposed to be
the results before the first exchange that is discarded?
> What happens if you leave out the "-rem 1" flag?
I could not get replica exchange using groupfile with or without the
"-rem 1" flag.
Peter
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Thu Nov 03 2005 - 19:53:00 PST
