Re: AMBER: SHAKE error

From: David A. Case <>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:57:02 -0700

On Sat, Jul 23, 2005, Agata Jurkiewicz wrote:

> But maybe the initial geometry od dUMP is a problem which I can't see
> at once, examining the pdb file? Should I run vacuum calculation with
> dielc=4 to test the initial geometry?

I think that running a vacuum simulation with dielc=4 is a good idea. It will
go very fast, and will help isolate the problem: if you still get failures
here, it is probably a force-field related problem that has little or nothing
to do with water, periodic boundary conditions, how fast you heat up, etc.


The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to
Received on Tue Jul 26 2005 - 01:53:00 PDT
Custom Search