Re: AMBER: Dummy torsion paramters for thermodynamic integration

From: David A. Case <>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 07:49:29 -0800

On Tue, Dec 21, 2004, Thomas Steinbrecher wrote:
> Is this error still relevant if I perform my TI runs with
> sander instead off gibbs? If not can I turn it off to be
> able to write my top files without these lines?

The warning is relevant to both sander and gibbs.

> When I add the dummy parameters requested, even after
> removing duplicate ones, ca. 30 entries remain for my
> .frcmod file. When I load these, I get another warning:
> -----
> WARNING: expected Improper Torsion PK>0 (0.000000)
> WARNING: expected Improper Torsion PHASE=180 (0.000000)

These are just warnings: since you have a force constant of 0, it doesn't
really matter that the phase is not 180 (which it should be for a real
improper). In the past, someone thought it was important to notify the
user when they were entering dummy parameters (with PK=0), but this may be
oversolicitous. But you can just ignore these messages.

....good luck....happy holidays!....dac

The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to
Received on Tue Dec 21 2004 - 15:53:00 PST
Custom Search