Dear Mr. Case,
We got the AMBER 7 a couple of months ago to our group, and I read the
document 0README which is under the resp directory. (Specifically
/amber7/src/resp) It was described in Mr. Caldwell's email which is part
of this 0README file. I am trying to recalculate the Cornell et al.95
results, but as far as I understood, it is not possible because of the
orientation problem of the molecule at interest.
Best,
--
Ilyas Yildirim
---------------------------------------------------------------
- Department of Chemisty - Home Address: -
- University of Rochester - -
- Hutchison Hall, Office B10 - 60 Crittenden Blvd. Apt. 232 -
- Rochester, NY 14627-0216 - Rochester, NY 14620 -
- Ph.:(585) 275 20 31 (Office) - Ph.:(585) 242 91 37 (Home) -
- Homepage: http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~yildirim/ -
---------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, David A. Case wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2004, Ilyas Yildirim wrote:
> >
> > 4. I tried to follow Cornell's paper to recalculate the results published
> > in 1995. I read the RESP documents that are in the scripps website, and in
> > those info files it is saying that in order the results to be compatible
> > with Cornell et al. 95 force field,
> > #P MP2/6-31G* pop=mk iop(6/33=2)
> > needs to be used in the gaussian input file.
>
> Can you point to the exact URL where this is? I am not doubting you, by
> my Google search failed to find this... The first statement in the FAQ
> entry on RESP states: "MP2 is not used for obtaining the electrostatic
> potential to fit." We will try to scrub out or explain better any
> contradictory statements, if we can find them.
>
> ...thanks in advance....dave case
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Fri Mar 19 2004 - 20:53:01 PST