On Mon, Mar 03, 2003, Sophia Kondratova wrote:
> What is a good value for tautp for gibbs simulations (FEP) using the NPT
> periodic boundary conditions. The reason I am asking is because the default
> in sander is 1.0 while the default in gibbs is 0.1, even though both are
> doing MD simulations.
The gibbs default is really too short, since known artefacts of the coupling
get worse as tautp gets shorter. I would recommend the larger value.
...dac
--
==================================================================
David A. Case | e-mail: case.scripps.edu
Dept. of Molecular Biology, TPC15 | fax: +1-858-784-8896
The Scripps Research Institute | phone: +1-858-784-9768
10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd. | home page:
La Jolla CA 92037 USA | http://www.scripps.edu/case
==================================================================
Received on Mon Mar 03 2003 - 22:29:20 PST