Re: procheck

From: David A. Case <case_at_scripps.edu>
Date: Tue 5 Nov 2002 08:31:31 -0800

On Tue, Nov 05, 2002, hung_at_atc.atccu.chula.ac.th wrote:
>
> Does anybody experience "unrecognized atom type [CB ] in residue
> VAL 146" in PROCHECK? "CB" of all residues (154) were said to be
> unrecognized.
>

How are you making your pdb file? Be sure to use the "brookhaven"
formatting for atom names if you use ambpdb. This is the default in
Amber 7, but required a switch (I think is is "-brook") in earlier
versions. In any event, check the formatting of the CB cards in your
file against a genuine PDB file to see if you can spot formatting differences.

...dac


-- 
==================================================================
David A. Case                     |  e-mail:      case_at_scripps.edu
Dept. of Molecular Biology, TPC15 |  fax:          +1-858-784-8896
The Scripps Research Institute    |  phone:        +1-858-784-9768
10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd.         |  home page:                   
La Jolla CA 92037  USA            |    http://www.scripps.edu/case
==================================================================
Received on Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:31:31 PST
Custom Search