Re: EGB = NaNQ

From: Andreas Svrcek-Seiler <svrci_at_tbi.univie.ac.at>
Date: Fri 4 Oct 2002 17:30:50 +0200 (CEST)

Hi,
> VDWAALS = ************* EEL = -27157.4566 EGB = NaNQ
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
the VDWAALS result seems to indicate that some atoms are VERY close, which
can cause trouble for the EGB routine.
I think you should start the minimization with 'epsilon=r' or something
like that until the bad contacts have relaxed and
then continue
having GB turned on.
hope it helps,
regards
Andreas

-- 
             
            )))))
            (((((
           ( O O )
-------oOOO--(_)--OOOo-----------------------------------------------------
              o        Wolfgang Andreas Svrcek-Seiler  
              o        (godzilla) 
                       svrci_at_tbi.univie.ac.at
      .oooO            Tel.:01-4277-52733 
      (   )   Oooo.    
-------\ (----(   )--------------------------------------------------------
        \_)    ) /
              (_/

Received on Fri Oct 04 2002 - 08:30:50 PDT